<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>33Rockers &#187; adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://33rockers.com/tag/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://33rockers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 01:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash content now spidered by Google</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/</link>
		<comments>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Rubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://33rockers.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the battle against sites built on <em>All Flash </em>technology may have lost some ground.  One easy way to steer development away from "flashy" sites with <em>things flying in and out everywhere</em> has been that Flash sites "can't be indexed by search engines".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google killed this argument last week when it announced that this is a shortcoming of the past.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">from Google Webmaster Central Blog:<br />
&#8220;Google has been developing a new algorithm for indexing textual content in Flash files of all kinds, from Flash menus, buttons and banners, to self-contained Flash websites. Recently, we&#8217;ve improved the performance of this Flash indexing algorithm by integrating Adobe&#8217;s Flash Player technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, Flash site development still tends toward tiny unreadable text and annoyingly long page transitions. I like Flash, in it&#8217;s place &#8211; there are things that html still cannot do that flash can ( even with the help of ajax)&#8230;  But do we really need more <em>All Flash</em> sites? <span id="more-722"></span></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html">Improved Flash indexing</a> 6/30/08, Google Webmaster Central Blog</li>
<li><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/google-learns-to-crawl-flash.html">Google learns to crawl Flash</a> 6/30/08 The Official Google Blog</li>
<li><a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/swf_searchability.html">SWF searchability FAQ</a> Adobe Developer Central</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

