<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>33Rockers &#187; flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://33rockers.com/tag/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://33rockers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 01:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>jQuery Versus Flash</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2011/01/26/jquery-versus-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://33rockers.com/2011/01/26/jquery-versus-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elvis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JQuery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jQuery vs flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://33rockers.com/?p=2200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle between jQuery and Flash is more intense now than ever before. It is time to find out which one is the best.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a rel="attachment wp-att-2201" href="http://33rockers.com/2011/01/26/jquery-versus-flash/flash_vs_jqurey_thumb/"><img class="size-full wp-image-2201  aligncenter" src="http://33rockers.com/files/2011/01/flash_vs_jqurey_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Nowadays, more and more people are trying to figure out which is the best method of creating a website and it seems that Flash and jQuery always stand out. These platforms are not exactly the same, but people tend to compare their capabilities because you can use either one of them for creating very interesting effects. Let’s take a closer look at the differences and see which one is better.</p>
<h2>Browser <span style="color: #ff0000">Compatibility</span></h2>
<p>One of the biggest problems that Flash has is compatibility. On a freshly installed operating system, viewing Flash content is not possible, so your website might be overlooked if the user doesn’t want to install the <a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/">Flash plug in</a>. This is a big disadvantage for Flash, but since this was the first platform to come out, most people already have the plug in installed on their computer and viewing these websites is not a problem.</p>
<h2>Animation and Graphic <span style="color: #ff0000">Complexity</span></h2>
<p>While jQuery might be easier to use and learn as an up and coming developer, flash experts can create more complicated transitions and effects through their platform. The limitations are only set by their imagination and creating something completely unique even after seeing thousands of websites is not a problem for a Flash specialist. <a href="http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/8-sites-with-excellent-jquery-navigation/">jQuery is getting better </a>in this department day after day, but there is still a noticeable gap between the two platforms. 3D capabilities are only available in Flash, which is certainly a big advantage.</p>
<h2>User <span style="color: #ff0000">Experience</span></h2>
<p>In most cases, a <a href="http://jquerystyle.com/">jQuery website</a> will load quicker than a Flash one simply because the file size is usually smaller. Flash websites tend to consume more resources and the final file size is a little bit larger. However, those who have a decent internet connection and a medium range computer won’t notice the difference. This is only a problem for people who have a very poor internet connection or a very old machine.</p>
<h2>Miscellaneous</h2>
<p>One of jQuery’s biggest problems is that the source code is not protected. Once you put it up on your website, anyone can copy your work and use it on their domain. In the case of Flash, this is not a problem and getting to the source code is nearly impossible.</p>
<p>When targeting users who are browsing the internet through their phone, jQuery has the upper hand since Flash is not supported on most mobile devices. Even so, creating a mobile version for your Flash website is not a complicated job.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff0000">Conclusion</span></h2>
<p>In the end, there is no clear winner in the battle between Flash and jQuery. Both of these platforms are useful for certain situations and each one of them comes with a set of advantages and disadvantages. You will have to figure out which one is best for you depending on your particular needs and your skill level. Most websites will obtain great results through both of these platforms and you will only feel the need to use one or the other when you are looking for a particular effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://33rockers.com/2011/01/26/jquery-versus-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Reasons That Make JQuery Better than Flash</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elvis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JQuery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery better than flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://33rockers.com/?p=1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As JQuery is easy to use, is not expensive and has great animation capabilities, Flash is no longer the number one. Taking all advantages into account, JQuery is better than Flash.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1748" href="http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/2-21/"></a>Macromedia launched the now legendary Flash platform in 1996. It allowed web designers to vastly improve a visitor’s website experience by creating content rich interactive media websites, which was not possible hitherto. For many years, Macromedia enjoyed a monopoly, as no other competitor could hope to match Flash (some skeptics will disagree and some may cite HTML5 as a rival, but none of them can really match Flash). But this changed when JQuery was introduced in 2006 by an American, John Resig. JQuery is a JavaScript Framework that is now becoming very popular, and may even replace Flash in the future.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1747" href="http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/1-22/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1747" src="http://33rockers.com/files/2010/09/15.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="401" /></a></p>
<p>Here are 5 Reasons why JQuery is better than Flash, and why Flash is now seriously threatened:</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff0000">Compatibility is a</span> key factor</h2>
<p>If Flash has a real Achilles heel, then this is it. Flash is not compatible with the iPhone, iPad and other popular cell phones. This is a huge drawback, and many people wouldn’t consider using Flash just for this very reason and this is where JQuery scores heavily over the Flash. JQuery is compatible with all these cell phones. Also, Flash may not be compatible with all web browsers, while JQuery is compatible with them all.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://33rockers.com/files/2010/09/25.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="300" /></p>
<h2>Ease <span style="color: #ff0000">of Use</span></h2>
<p>You need to be a designing expert to be able to create even the simplest stuff using Flash and it is difficult. But you don’t need to have more than some basic knowledge of HTML and JavaScript for JQuery; and everything is easy to create. JQuery offers almost all the same capabilities as Flash, and the load is much lighter and easier to design than Flash. There are many more customization options in JQuery.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff0000">Textual</span> Enhancement</h2>
<p>Flash is not good when combined with text, and this is a well publicized fact. Flash is a heavy duty platform meant for showcasing media, and it fails miserably when combined with text. You won’t find many text based websites, like news sites, using much of Flash. But JQuery works like a dream when combined with text, and it helps improve readability of the content significantly.</p>
<h2>Money <span style="color: #ff0000">Matters</span></h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ff0000"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1749" href="http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/3-21/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1749" src="http://33rockers.com/files/2010/09/35.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="178" /></a></span></h2>
<p>If you want to work with Flash, you have to buy a Flash suite, which can set you back by quite a bit. Upgrades also cost a lot of money, and you may need to hire a Flash expert to create a website if you don’t have the requisite designing knowledge. But JQuery is completely free! Also, JQuery incorporates almost all the features that Flash does.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff0000">Looks are</span> important</h2>
<p>The way a website looks is very important; especially when you need to attract more visitors and Flash was the first choice when designers wanted to create a shiny website. But now Jquery (combined with HTML) can create flashy websites that can rival any Flash based ones, and because of the other advantages, JQuery is the perfect choice for designers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://33rockers.com/2010/09/22/5-reasons-that-make-jquery-better-than-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash content now spidered by Google</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/</link>
		<comments>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Rubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://33rockers.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the battle against sites built on <em>All Flash </em>technology may have lost some ground.  One easy way to steer development away from "flashy" sites with <em>things flying in and out everywhere</em> has been that Flash sites "can't be indexed by search engines".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google killed this argument last week when it announced that this is a shortcoming of the past.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">from Google Webmaster Central Blog:<br />
&#8220;Google has been developing a new algorithm for indexing textual content in Flash files of all kinds, from Flash menus, buttons and banners, to self-contained Flash websites. Recently, we&#8217;ve improved the performance of this Flash indexing algorithm by integrating Adobe&#8217;s Flash Player technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, Flash site development still tends toward tiny unreadable text and annoyingly long page transitions. I like Flash, in it&#8217;s place &#8211; there are things that html still cannot do that flash can ( even with the help of ajax)&#8230;  But do we really need more <em>All Flash</em> sites? <span id="more-722"></span></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html">Improved Flash indexing</a> 6/30/08, Google Webmaster Central Blog</li>
<li><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/google-learns-to-crawl-flash.html">Google learns to crawl Flash</a> 6/30/08 The Official Google Blog</li>
<li><a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/swf_searchability.html">SWF searchability FAQ</a> Adobe Developer Central</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://33rockers.com/2008/07/03/flash-content-now-spidered-by-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

